CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Human cannonball

Ejection of a human being from a specially designed cannon

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ1920860
Source-derived summary

The human cannonball act is a performance in which a person who acts as the "cannonball" is ejected from a cylinder that has been specially designed to resemble a cannon. The human cannonball lands on a horizontal net or inflated bag placed at the predicted landing point. Outdoor performances may aim at a body of water.

History

William Leonard Hunt, known in the circus world as "The Great Farini", conceived and designed the basic act in the early 1870s, filing a patent for launching a human projectile in 1871. Hunt's cannon used rubber springs to launch a person from the cannon, limiting the distance they could be launched. His adopted son, Samuel Wasgate, was the first to perform as the human projectile, dressed in female clothing and billed as "Lulu" in an 1873 act referred to as the "Lulu Leap".

The first act billed as a "human cannonball", launched in 1877 at the Royal Aquarium in London using the same contraption used for the "Lulu Leap", was the 17-year-old Rossa Matilda Richter, going by the stage name "Zazel". Richter is often erroneously credited with being the first performer of the act. She later toured with the P.T. Barnum Circus. Richter's career as a human cannonball ended when she broke her back during an unrelated tightrope act.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Human cannonball” as ejection of a human being from a specially designed cannon. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1871, 1873, 1877—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Human, cannonball and Ejection can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as ejection of a human being from a specially designed cannon. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1920860. The first chronological checks are 1871, 1873 and 1877.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Human cannonball”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Human cannonball primary sources, Human cannonball archive and Human research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Human cannonball”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Human cannonball” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.