CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Huara antarctica

species of arachnid

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 19, 2025
Entity authorityQ1816232 ↗
Source-derived summary

Huara antarctica is a species of Desidae that is endemic to New Zealand.

Taxonomy

This species was described as Gohia antarctica by Lucien Berland in 1931 from male and female specimens. It was most recently revised in 1973. The holotype is stored in Canterbury Museum.

Description

This species is recorded at 10mm in length.

Distribution

This species is only known from the Auckland Islands, New Zealand.

Conservation status

Under the New Zealand Threat Classification System, this species is listed as "Naturally Uncommon" with the qualifiers of "Island Endemic" and "Range Restricted".

Editorial summary

“Huara antarctica” enters the record as species of arachnid. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Huara, antarctica and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1931, 1973—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Huara, antarctica and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Huara antarctica” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Huara, antarctica and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 19, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1816232. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1931 and 1973.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Huara antarctica”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Huara antarctica primary sources, Huara antarctica archive and Huara research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Huara antarctica”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Huara antarctica” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.