CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

How Mine F.C.

football club in Zimbabwe

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 19, 2024
Entity authorityQ15627333
Source-derived summary

How Mine Football Club was a football club based in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. The club played in the Zimbabwe Premier Soccer League before surrendering their license before the 2018 season. The team was sponsored by the How gold mine.

How Mine appeared in the 2017 Chibuku Cup final, losing 3–1 to Harare City.

Stadium

The team played in the 20,000-seat Luveve and White City Stadium in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “How Mine F.C.” as football club in Zimbabwe. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2018, 2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Mine, football and club can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as football club in Zimbabwe. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 19, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q15627333. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018 and 2017.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “How Mine F.C.”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow How Mine F.C. primary sources, How Mine F.C. archive and Mine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “How Mine F.C.”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from How Mine F.C.” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.