CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

House of Cool

Canadian animation studio

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ5914858
Source-derived summary

House of Cool Studios is a boutique animation studio based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and founded as a pre-production studio in 1994 by animation veteran Ricardo Curtis and finance expert Wes Lui, specializing in designing and storyboarding of films, series and commercials.

On March 29, 2023, Canadian media company WildBrain announced its intent to acquire the company for CA$18.3 million. The acquisition was completed on July 19, 2023.

Red Rover Studios

Red Rover Studios was founded in London by Andy and Linzi Knight in 1994. It was a full production studio that focused on 2D and CGI animation. They later moved to Toronto, Ontario, Canada. However, in July 2008, Red Rover was acquired by House of Cool after Andy Knight died, three months earlier.

Filmography

As Red Rover Studios

All Dogs Go to Heaven 2 (1996) (film)

Broken Sword: Circle of Blood (1996) (video game)

Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars (1996) (video game)

Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas (1997) (film)

Ned's Newt (1997) (TV series)

1001 Nights (1998) (film)

Bob and Margaret (1999) (TV series)

Joseph: King of Dreams (2000) (film)

Snickers (2000)

The Ripping Friends (2001) (TV series)

Hey Arnold!: The Jungle Movie (2001) (film, test footage)

Pig City (2002) (TV series)

Get Ed (2005) (TV series)

Reefer Madness: The Musical (2005) (film) ("The Brownie Song" sequence)

Gnomeo and Juliet (2011) (film)

As House of Cool

Horton Hears a Who!

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “House of Cool” as canadian animation studio. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1994, 2023, 2008, 1996—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2004. The account is most persuasive where House, Cool and Canadian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as canadian animation studio. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5914858. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1994, 2023, 2008 and 1996.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “House of Cool”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow House of Cool primary sources, House of Cool archive and House research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “House of Cool”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from House of Cool” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.