Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
2012 United States Supreme Court case

Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 565 U.S. 171 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that federal discrimination laws do not apply to religious organizations' selection of religious leaders.
Background
In 1999, Cheryl Perich started teaching at Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School, an affiliate of the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod in Redford, Michigan. In addition to other duties, Perich led students in prayer and taught a religion class several days a week. In 2004, Perich left on disability and was diagnosed with narcolepsy. In 2005, after she was cleared by her doctors to go back to work, the school told her that it already hired someone else. Perich threatened to file suit, and the school promptly fired her for "insubordination and disruptive behavior". Perich sued for unlawful dismissal under the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act.
Opinion of the Court
All nine Supreme Court justices agreed with the decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts that "the Establishment Clause prevents the Government from appointing ministers, and the Free Exercise Clause prevents it from interfering with the freedom of religious groups to select their own". Moreover, because the respondent, in this case, was a minister within the meaning of the ministerial exception, the First Amendment requires dismissal of her employment discrimination suit against her religious employer.
“Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission” enters the record as 2012 United States Supreme Court case. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Hosanna-Tabor, Evangelical and Lutheran can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Hosanna-Tabor, Evangelical and Lutheran provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5907177. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2012, 1999, 2004 and 2005.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission primary sources, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission archive and Hosanna-Tabor research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.