Horn function
Open-knowledge reference entry
In the theory of special functions in mathematics, the Horn functions (named for Jakob Horn) are the 34 distinct convergent hypergeometric series of order two (i.e. having two independent variables), enumerated by Horn (1931) (corrected by Borngässer (1933)). They are listed in (Erdélyi et al. 1953, section 5.7.1). B. C. Carlson revealed a problem with the Horn function classification scheme.
The total 34 Horn functions can be further categorised into 14 complete hypergeometric functions and 20 confluent hypergeometric functions. The complete functions, with their domain of convergence, are:
F
1
(
α
;
β
,
β
′
;
γ
;
z
,
w
)
≡
∑
m
=
0
∞
∑
n
=
0
∞
(
α
)
m
+
n
(
β
)
m
(
β
′
)
n
(
γ
)
m
+
n
z
m
w
n
m
!
n
!
/
;
|
z
|
<
1
∧
|
w
|
<
1
{\displaystyle F_{1}(\alpha ;\beta ,\beta ';\gamma ;z,w)\equiv \sum _{m=0}^{\infty }\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {(\alpha )_{m+n}(\beta )_{m}(\beta ')_{n}}{(\gamma )_{m+n}}}{\frac {z^{m}w^{n}}{m!n!}}/;|z|<1\land |w|<1}
F
2
(
α
;
β
,
β
′
;
γ
,
γ
′
;
z
,
w
)
≡
∑
m
=
0
∞
∑
n
=
0
∞
(
α
)
m
+
n
(
β
)
m
(
β
′
)
n
(
γ
)
m
(
γ
′
)
n
z
m
w
n
m
!
n
!
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Horn function” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17027577. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1931, 1933 and 1953.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Horn function”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Horn function primary sources, Horn function archive and Horn research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Horn function”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Horn function” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.