Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y
Christian theological positions on homosexuality
Sides A, B, X, and Y are labels used for theological positions on homosexuality within some Christian churches and communities. In general, those who affirm same-sex marriage fall under "Side A", while those who do not affirm it are classified as "Side B", "Side X", or "Side Y". The letters A and B have been suggested to refer to the two sides of a phonograph record.
While differing in their views on same-sex marriage, the four groups often address issues affecting the LGBTQ community. Side A and Side B generally oppose conversion therapy and accept LGBTQ identification, including the term "gay Christian". Side X generally affirms the pursuit of exclusive heterosexuality and supports the ex-gay movement. Side Y claims to be opposed to identity politics and affirms Christian regeneration as the primary form of transformation.
There are no standardized definitions for the four positions, and individuals do not always identify with these labels. Some, particularly those associated with Side Y, may prefer terms such as "Bible-believing Christian" or "eunuch for the kingdom of God".
Side A (affirming)
Many LGBTQ-affirming churches align with the perspective known as Side A and may describe themselves using terms such as affirming or welcoming or inclusive.
“Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y” enters the record as christian theological positions on homosexuality. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Side, Christian and theological can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Side, Christian and theological provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q120000057. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y primary sources, Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y archive and Side research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.