Hölder condition
type of continuity of a complex-valued function

In mathematics, we say that a function satisfies a Hölder condition, or is
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
-Hölder continuous or simply Hölder continuous, if for a real or complex-valued function
f
{\displaystyle f}
on
d
{\displaystyle d}
-dimensional Euclidean space, i.e.
f
:
Ω
→
R
{\displaystyle f:\Omega \to \mathbb {R} }
or
C
{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }
(where
Ω
⊆
R
d
{\displaystyle \Omega \subseteq \mathbb {R} ^{d}}
or
C
d
{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{d}}
), when there are real constants
C
≥
0
{\displaystyle C\geq 0}
,
α
>
0
{\displaystyle \alpha >0}
, such that
|
f
(
x
)
−
f
(
y
)
|
≤
C
‖
x
−
y
‖
α
{\displaystyle |f(x)-f(y)|\leq C\|x-y\|^{\alpha }}
for all
x
,
y
∈
Ω
{\displaystyle x,y\in \Omega }
. More generally, the condition can be formulated for functions between any two metric spaces. The number
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
is called the exponent of the Hölder condition. A function on an interval satisfying the condition with
α
>
1
{\displaystyle \alpha >1}
is constant (see proof below). If
α
=
1
{\displaystyle \alpha =1}
, then the function satisfies a Lipschitz condition. For any
α
>
0
{\displaystyle \alpha >0}
, the condition implies the function is uniformly continuous. The condition is named after Otto Hölder.
If
α
=
0
{\displaystyle \alpha =0}
, the function is simply bounded (any two values
f
{\displaystyle f}
takes are at most
C
{\displaystyle C}
apart).
We have the following chain of inclusions for functions defined on a closed and bounded interval [a, b] of the real line with a < b:
where 0 < α ≤ 1.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Hölder condition” is type of continuity of a complex-valued function. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Hölder, condition and type, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “type of continuity of a complex-valued function” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q91259930. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hölder condition”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hölder condition primary sources, Hölder condition archive and Hölder research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hölder condition”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hölder condition” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.