Hohem
Chinese technology company
Shenzhen Hohem Technology Co., Ltd., is a technology company based in Shenzhen, China. It is dedicated to the independent research, development, production, and sales of stabilizers and flight control systems. It was founded by Chen Min in 2014. Hohem's products are designed for smartphones, action cameras, and DSLR cameras.
History
In 2015, Hohem introduced its first three-axis handheld action camera stabilizer.
In 2016, the company unveiled a smartphone stabilizer with automatic face tracking technology at CES.
In 2017, Hohem launched its first foldable smartphone stabilizer and had a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo.
In 2020, Hohem released the iSteady X, the company's three-axis smartphone gimbal, which won the 2020 SVIEF Disruptive Innovation Award.
In 2021, Hohem released the iSteady V2, an AI tracking three-axis stabilizer, along with the iSteady X2 and iSteady Q.
In 2023, Hohem launched the iSteady M6 smartphone stabilizer and updated the iSteady XE, iSteady V2s, and iSteady MT2. The iSteady MT2, a 4-in-1 camera stabilizer.
Reviews
While Hohem's technology and products have received positive reviews in many aspects, some reviewers pointed out potential design flaws in the Hohem X2 gimbal.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Hohem” as chinese technology company. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as chinese technology company. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q124289454. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hohem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hohem primary sources, Hohem archive and Hohem research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hohem”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hohem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.