Phaenicophilidae
bird family
Phaenicophilidae are a family of passerine birds mostly endemic to the West Indies. They are variously called the Greater Antillean Tanagers or the Hispaniolan Tanagers. The family contains nine species in five genera. These species were historically classified within the families Thraupidae (tanagers) and Parulidae (New World warblers), but genetic studies have confirmed they form a distinct clade.
Taxonomy
The family was originally established to classify the genus Phaenicophilus. It was reinstated when molecular genetic studies revealed that various species traditionally classified in Thraupidae (including the two Phaenicophilus species) and some from Parulidae were not as closely related to the members of those families as they were to each other. This led to the inclusion of the genera Microligea and Xenoligea into Phaenicophilidae. Most recently, several other groups of Caribbean tanagers—specifically the genera Nesospingus and Spindalis—which had been tentatively associated with this group have been added to the family. Analyses by Barker et al. (2013, 2015) had suggested these latter two lineages were sufficiently divergent to warrant their own monotypic families: Nesospingidae and Spindalidae, respectively.
The public source identifies “Phaenicophilidae” as bird family. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Phaenicophilidae, bird and family.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Phaenicophilidae”, the useful work is to connect “bird family” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21844785. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013 and 2015.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Phaenicophilidae”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Phaenicophilidae primary sources, Phaenicophilidae archive and Phaenicophilidae research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Phaenicophilidae”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Phaenicophilidae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.