Hindustani orthography
writing systems for the Hindustani language, including Devanagari, Perso-Arabic (Urdu) script, various romanization systems, and Braille

Hindustani (standardized Hindi and standardized Urdu) has been written in several different scripts. Most Hindi texts are written in the Devanagari script, which is derived from the Brahmi script of the ancient India. Most Urdu texts are written in the Urdu alphabet, which comes from the Persian alphabet. Hindustani has been written in both scripts. In recent years, the Latin script has been used in these languages for technological or internationalization reasons. Historically, Kaithi and Gurmukhi (both of which are Brahmic scripts) has also been used.
Devanagari script
The Devanagari script is an abugida, as written consonants have an inherent vowel, which in Standard Hindi is a schwa. In certain contexts, such as at the end of words, there is no vowel, a phenomenon called the schwa deletion (or schwa syncope). Other vowels are written with a diacritic on the consonant letter. Devanagari is written from left to right, with a top-bar connecting the letters together.
The public source identifies “Hindustani orthography” as writing systems for the Hindustani language, including Devanagari, Perso-Arabic (Urdu) script, various romanization systems, and Braille. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Hindustani, orthography and writing.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Hindustani orthography”, the useful work is to connect “writing systems for the Hindustani language, including Devanagari, Perso-Arabic (Urdu) script, various romanization systems, and Braille” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5766880. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hindustani orthography”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hindustani orthography primary sources, Hindustani orthography archive and Hindustani research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hindustani orthography”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hindustani orthography” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.