CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Henry, Duke of Brunswick-Dannenberg

Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg and Prince of Lüneburg

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 15, 2024
Entity authorityQ65819 ↗
Source-derived summary

Henry III (1533 – 19 January 1598), a member of the House of Welf, was Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg and ruling Prince of Lüneburg from 1559 until 1569, jointly with his brother William the Younger. From 1569, he ruled over the Lordship of Dannenberg until his death.

Henry was the second surviving son of Duke Ernest I of Brunswick-Lüneburg and assumed the rule in the Principality of Lüneburg upon the early death of his elder brother Francis Otto in 1559. He and his younger brother William fell out with each other in 1569, when Henry married the Ascanian princess Ursula of Saxe-Lauenburg (1545–1620), daughter of Duke Francis I, and demanded the partition of the Lüneburg lands.

He eventually waived his claims to the Lüneburg principality and received Dannenberg as a paréage as well as an annual payment in compensation. He also ensured that his descendants were entitled to inherit the Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel estates upon the extinction of the line; therefore, his youngest son Augustus could assume the rule in Wolfenbüttel in 1635.

Henry died in Dannenberg.

Marriage and children who reached adulthood

In 1569 Henry married Ursula of Saxe-Lauenburg (*1545 – 22 October 1620*, Schernebeck), daughter of Francis I of Saxe-Lauenburg. They had the following children:

Julius Ernest (1571–1636)

Francis (1572–1601) Provost of Strasbourg

Anne Sophie (1573–1574)

Heinrich (1574–1575)

Sybil Elizabeth (1576–1630), married Anthony II, Count of Delmenhorst

Sidonia (1577–1645)

Augustus (1579–1666)

His agnatic progeny went extinct in 1884.

References

Sources

Ward, A.W.; Prothero, G.W.; Leathes, Stanley, eds.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Henry, Duke of Brunswick-Dannenberg” as duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg and Prince of Lüneburg. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1533, 1598, 1559, 1569—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1533-06-04, 1533—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. The account is most persuasive where Henry, Duke and Brunswick-Dannenberg can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg and Prince of Lüneburg. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 15, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q65819. VIAF identifies the subject as 77525480. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1533, 1598, 1559 and 1569.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Henry, Duke of Brunswick-Dannenberg”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Henry, Duke of Brunswick-Dannenberg primary sources, Henry, Duke of Brunswick-Dannenberg archive and Henry research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Henry, Duke of Brunswick-Dannenberg”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Henry, Duke of Brunswick-Dannenberg” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.