The Henry James Review
journal
The Henry James Review is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal established in 1979 and is the official publication of the Henry James Society part of The Center for Henry James Studies at Creighton University. It is dedicated to the scholarly, critical, and theoretical study of the American writer Henry James. Each issue focuses on a specific theme of interest and seeks to promote understanding and study of James' contributions. The journal is published by the Johns Hopkins University Press and the current editor-in-chief is Greg W. Zacharias (Creighton University).
The public source identifies “The Henry James Review” as journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Henry, James and Review.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “The Henry James Review”, the useful work is to connect “journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 15, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7739375. 7 of 7 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1979.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “The Henry James Review”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow The Henry James Review primary sources, The Henry James Review archive and Henry research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Henry James Review”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “The Henry James Review” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.