Cambell baronets
extinct baronetcy in the Baronetage of England

There have been two baronetcies created for members of the Cambell family, both in the Baronetage of England. Both creations are extinct.
The Cambell Baronetcy, of Woodford in the County of Essex, was created in the Baronetage of England on 9 April 1661 for John Cambell. The title became extinct on his death in 1661.
The Cambell Baronetcy, of Clay Hall in the County of Essex, was created in the Baronetage of England on 12 February 1664 for Thomas Cambell. He was the uncle of the first Baronet of the 1661 creation and the grandson of Sir Thomas Cambell, Lord Mayor of London from 1609 to 1610. The title became extinct on the death of his younger son, the third Baronet, in 1699.
Cambell baronets, of Woodford (1661)
Sir John Cambell, 1st Baronet (died 1662)
Cambell baronets, of Clay Hall (1664)
Sir Thomas Cambell, 1st Baronet (c. 1620–1665)
Sir Thomas Cambell, 2nd Baronet (c.
“Cambell baronets” enters the record as extinct baronetcy in the Baronetage of England. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cambell, baronets and extinct can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Cambell baronets” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cambell, baronets and extinct provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 9, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q5025029. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1661, 1664, 1609 and 1610.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Cambell baronets”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Cambell baronets primary sources, Cambell baronets archive and Cambell research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cambell baronets”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Cambell baronets” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.