CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Helmut Huter

luger

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 22, 2025
Entity authorityQ5709639 ↗
Source-derived summary

Helmut Huter was an Austrian luger who competed in the late 1970s and early 1980s. He won two medals in the men's doubles event at the FIL World Luge Natural Track Championships with a silver in 1979 and a bronze in 1980.

Huter also two medals at the FIL European Luge Natural Track Championships with a gold in 1978 (Doubles) and a bronze in 1975 (Singles).

References

External links

Natural track European Championships results 1970-2006.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Helmut Huter” as luger. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Helmut, Huter and luger.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1979, 1980, 1978, 1975—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Helmut, Huter and luger providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Helmut Huter”, the useful work is to connect “luger” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 22, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5709639. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1979, 1980, 1978 and 1975.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Helmut Huter”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Helmut Huter primary sources, Helmut Huter archive and Helmut research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Helmut Huter”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Helmut Huter” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.