CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Helicoprion

genus of fossil fishes

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ133376 ↗
Source-derived summary

Helicoprion is an extinct genus of large shark-like cartilaginous fish that lived from the Early to the Middle Permian, about 290-270 million years ago. Helicoprion is a member of the Eugeneodontiformes, an extinct order of cartilaginous fish within the clade Holocephali, a group today represented only by chimaeras. It is also the type genus of the Helicoprionidae, a family of eugeneodonts characterised by distinctive tooth structures called tooth whorls. Helicoprion was first named in 1899 by Alexander Karpinsky on the basis of fossils discovered in Russia and Australia, the generic name meaning "spiral saw". Although numerous species were subsequently assigned to the genus, only H. bessonowi, H. davisii, and H. ergassaminon are recognized following a 2013 revision. The three species are distinguished by the shape and spacing of their tooth crowns.

Helicoprion is mainly known from its fused, spiral-shaped tooth whorls, which account for almost all documented fossils of the taxon. The position and function of these structures was long debated, but studies based on specimens preserving jaw cartilage indicate that they were positioned in the lower jaw and were specialised for grasping and slicing soft-bodied prey such as cephalopods. The whorl may also have aided in shelling or extracting the bodies of nautiloids and ammonoids. Based on the skeletal anatomy of smaller eugeneodonts, Helicoprion is estimated to have reached lengths between 5 and 12 m (16 and 39 ft), with a general external appearance possibly comparable to that of tunas, swordfish, or mackerel sharks.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Helicoprion” is genus of fossil fishes. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Helicoprion, genus and fossil, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1899, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Helicoprion, genus and fossil is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of fossil fishes” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q133376. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1899 and 2013.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Helicoprion”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Helicoprion primary sources, Helicoprion archive and Helicoprion research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Helicoprion”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Helicoprion” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.