CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Attenborougharion rubicundus

species of Gastropoda

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ32394936 ↗
Source-derived summary

Attenborougharion rubicundus is a species of air-breathing semi-slug, terrestrial pulmonate gastropod molluscs in the family Helicarionidae.

It has been referred to as the "burgundy snail", but should not be confused with Helix pomatia, which is also known by that name.

Taxonomy

This species was described under the name Helicarion rubicundus in 1978. The species was reassigned from genus Helicarion to Attenborougharion its own monotypic genus, named after David Attenborough, in 2017 by researchers at the Australian Museum. The description of this genus was formally published on 9 August 2017.

Distribution

This species is endemic to Australia, and is known only from the Forestier Peninsula and a small portion of the Tasman Peninsula on the island of Tasmania.

Description

These semi-slugs are about 27.5–45 mm in length and are bright green and bright red. The species has a flattened body and their reproductive system has an irregular shape compared to the usual V-shaped rows.

See also

List of things named after David Attenborough and his works

References

External links

Otley H.M. (1999). Survey report for the burgundy snail (Helicarion rubicundus) on the Forestier and Tasman Peninsulas.

Editorial summary

“Attenborougharion rubicundus” enters the record as species of Gastropoda. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Attenborougharion, rubicundus and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1978, 2017, 1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Attenborougharion, rubicundus and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Attenborougharion rubicundus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Attenborougharion, rubicundus and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q32394936. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1978, 2017 and 1999.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Attenborougharion rubicundus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Attenborougharion rubicundus primary sources, Attenborougharion rubicundus archive and Attenborougharion research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Attenborougharion rubicundus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Attenborougharion rubicundus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.