CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Heinrich Hoeftman

German physician and orthopedic surgeon (1851-1917)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ1597620 ↗
Source-derived summary

Heinrich Hoeftman (2 April 1851, in Memel – 17 September 1917, in Königsberg) was a German physician. He is regarded as a pioneer of modern German orthopedics.

He studied medicine for one semester at the University of Leipzig, then served as a volunteer in the Franco-Prussian War. In 1871, he resumed his studies at the University of Königsberg, receiving his doctorate in 1876 with the thesis "Ueber Ganglien und chronisch fungöse Sehnenscheiden-Entzündung". Following graduation, he worked for several months under surgeon Theodor Billroth at Vienna, then returned to Königsberg as an assistant to Karl Schönborn at the university hospital.

In 1880, he opened his own medical practice in Königsberg, and two years later took charge of a private clinic that eventually included an orthopedic workshop, a gymnastic institution and a modern orthopedic hospital with 120 beds. As a physician, he specialized in lower limb prosthesis.

In 1901, he was a founding member of the Deutschen Orthopädischen Gesellschaft (German Orthopedic Society), and in 1910 became a professor of orthopedics at the University of Königsberg. During World War I he served on the orthopedic advisory board of the First Army Corps.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Heinrich Hoeftman” as german physician and orthopedic surgeon (1851-1917). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Heinrich, Hoeftman and German.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1851, 1917, 1871, 1876—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1851-04-02. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Heinrich, Hoeftman and German providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Heinrich Hoeftman”, the useful work is to connect “german physician and orthopedic surgeon (1851-1917)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1597620. VIAF identifies the subject as 53390120. The Library of Congress control number is n94803448. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1851, 1917, 1871 and 1876.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Heinrich Hoeftman”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Heinrich Hoeftman primary sources, Heinrich Hoeftman archive and Heinrich research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Heinrich Hoeftman”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Heinrich Hoeftman” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.