CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth

species of moth

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ25004064 ↗
Source-derived summary

Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth (Omiodes meyrickii) is a species of moth in the family Pyralidae. It was described by Otto Herman Swezey in 1907 and is endemic to the island of Oʻahu in Hawaiʻi.

Sources

Haines, W.P. (2004). "Omiodes meyricki". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2004 e.T44548A10918270. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T44548A10918270.en. Retrieved 21 December 2017.

Zimmerman, Elwood C. (1958). Insects of Hawaii.

Editorial summary

“Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth” enters the record as species of moth. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Meyrick's, banana and hedyleptan can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1907, 2004, 2017, 1958—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Meyrick's, banana and hedyleptan.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Meyrick's, banana and hedyleptan provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q25004064. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1907, 2004, 2017 and 1958.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth primary sources, Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth archive and Meyrick's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Meyrick's banana hedyleptan moth” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.