CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Hedeoma nana

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ15327361 ↗
Source-derived summary

Hedeoma nana, the dwarf false pennyroyal, is a species of flowering plant in the mint family (Lamiaceae). It is native to parts of the southwestern and central United States and extends into northeastern Mexico. This occasionally aromatic herb occurs in a variety of open and semi-arid habitats and is known for its small, gland-dotted leaves and axillary clusters of flowers with inflated/flared corollas.

Description

Hedeoma nana is a perennial herb (occasionally woody at the base) typically 10–25 cm tall, often branching from the base with wiry stems. The leaves are small, opposite, and finely glandular, sometimes releasing a mild minty fragrance when crushed. The flowers are arranged in small clusters at the leaf axils, with tubular corollas usually in shades of blue-purple or pinkish hues, and bloom from spring through fall in much of its range.

Distribution and habitat

This species is native to the southwestern and south-central United States — including Arizona, California (especially the Mojave and other desert regions), Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah — and extends into northeastern Mexico. It typically grows in rocky calcareous slopes, desert scrub, pinyon-juniper woodland, and other open, dry habitats at elevations ranging from low valleys to mountainous regions.

Ecology

As a member of the mint family, Hedeoma nana produces nectar-rich flowers that attract a variety of insects. It is adapted to dry conditions and often contributes to the floral diversity of desert and semi-arid plant communities.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Hedeoma nana” as species of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 236-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Hedeoma, nana and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15327361. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Hedeoma nana”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Hedeoma nana primary sources, Hedeoma nana archive and Hedeoma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hedeoma nana”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Hedeoma nana” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.