Nepidermin
chemical compound
Nepidermin (INN proposed), also known as recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF), is a recombinant form of human epidermal growth factor (EGF) and a cicatrizant (a drug that promotes wound healing through formation of scar tissue). As a recombinant form of EGF, nepidermin is an agonist of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and is the first EGFR agonist to be marketed. It was developed by Cuban Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIBG), and has been marketed by Heber Biotech as an intralesional injection for diabetic foot ulcer under the trade name Heberprot-P since 2006. As of 2016, Heberprot-P had been marketed in 23 countries, but remains unavailable in the United States. In 2015, preparations were made to conduct the Phase III trials required for FDA approval, however as of 2023 developments in U.S.-Cuba relations have stymied importation of the drug from Cuba.
Various forms of rhEGF are marketed for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, wounds, and alopecia (hair loss) in Vietnam, the Philippines, Thailand, and China.
Production
According to Heber Biotech, nepidermin is made by insering the 53-amino acid human EGF sequence into yeast. A 1991 paper from Cuba seems to describe its production in more detail. An improved process was described in 2009.
Other rhEGFs
Several other products containing recombinant human EGF have been marketed.
The public source identifies “Nepidermin” as chemical compound. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Nepidermin, chemical and compound.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Nepidermin”, the useful work is to connect “chemical compound” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 31, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4006488. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2016, 2015 and 2023.
Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Nepidermin”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Nepidermin primary sources, Nepidermin archive and Nepidermin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nepidermin”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Nepidermin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.