CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Richard Yensen

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ140287699 ↗
Source-derived summary

Richard Yensen is an American–Panamanian psychologist and psychedelic drug researcher.

He was a research fellow at the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC) of the Spring Grove Hospital from 1972 until its closure in 1976. Yensen studied psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy under Stanislav Grof at the MPRC and did his 1975 Ph.D. dissertation on 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA)-assisted psychotherapy through the University of California, Irvine. Along with Claudio Naranjo, he is one of the foremost pioneers of entactogen-assisted psychotherapy.

Yensen has taught at Harvard Medical School, Johns Hopkins University, and the University of Maryland Medical School. His wife is psychiatrist and psychedelic drug researcher Donna Dryer. Yensen developed a novel non-drug shamanistic form of psychotherapy known as perceptual affective therapy. The Yensens are the founders and directors of the Orenda Institute, a psychedelic-assisted therapy organization aimed at continuing the work of centers like the MPRC. In the 1990s, the Yensens attempted to launch government-approved studies of LSD-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of alcoholism and other uses in the United States (FDA IND 3250), but this was ultimately unsuccessful and they soon opted to move to Canada instead.

Subsequently, the Yensens worked in the Canadian phase 2 clinical trials of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) conducted by the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) and Lykos Therapeutics (now Resilient Pharmaceuticals) in the 2010s. They are said to have been leaders of the trial they were involved in.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Richard Yensen” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Richard, Yensen and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972, 1976, 1975—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Richard, Yensen and Open-knowledge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q140287699. VIAF identifies the subject as 1263177. The Library of Congress control number is n78002787. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1972, 1976 and 1975.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Richard Yensen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Richard Yensen primary sources, Richard Yensen archive and Richard research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Richard Yensen”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Richard Yensen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.