Hasse–Davenport relation
two identities for Gauss sums

The Hasse–Davenport relations, introduced by Davenport and Hasse (1935), are two related identities for Gauss sums, one called the Hasse–Davenport lifting relation, and the other called the Hasse–Davenport product relation. The Hasse–Davenport lifting relation is an equality in number theory relating Gauss sums over different fields. Weil (1949) used it to calculate the zeta function of a Fermat hypersurface over a finite field, which motivated the Weil conjectures.
Gauss sums are analogues of the gamma function over finite fields, and the Hasse–Davenport product relation is the analogue of Gauss's multiplication formula
Γ
(
z
)
Γ
(
z
+
1
k
)
Γ
(
z
+
2
k
)
⋯
Γ
(
z
+
k
−
1
k
)
=
(
2
π
)
k
−
1
2
k
1
/
2
−
k
z
Γ
(
k
z
)
.
{\displaystyle \Gamma (z)\;\Gamma \left(z+{\frac {1}{k}}\right)\;\Gamma \left(z+{\frac {2}{k}}\right)\cdots \Gamma \left(z+{\frac {k-1}{k}}\right)=(2\pi )^{\frac {k-1}{2}}\;k^{1/2-kz}\;\Gamma (kz).\,\!}
In fact the Hasse–Davenport product relation follows from the analogous multiplication formula for p-adic gamma functions together with the Gross–Koblitz formula of Gross & Koblitz (1979).
Hasse–Davenport lifting relation
Let F be a finite field with q elements, and Fs be the field such that [Fs:F] = s, that is, s is the dimension of the vector space Fs over F.
Let
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
be an element of
F
s
{\displaystyle F_{s}}
.
Let
χ
{\displaystyle \chi }
be a multiplicative character from F to the complex numbers.
Let
N
F
s
/
F
(
α
)
{\displaystyle N_{F_{s}/F}(\alpha )}
be the norm from
F
s
{\displaystyle F_{s}}
to
F
{\displaystyle F}
defined by
N
F
s
/
F
(
α
)
:=
α
⋅
α
q
⋯
α
q
s
−
1
.
{\displaystyle N_{F_{s}/F}(\alpha ):=\alpha \cdot \alpha ^{q}\cdots \alpha ^{q^{s-1}}.\,}
Let
χ
′
{\displaystyle \chi '}
be the multiplicative character on
F
s
{\displaystyle F_{s}}
which is the composition of
χ
{\displaystyle \chi }
with the norm from Fs to F, that is
χ
′
(
α
)
:=
χ
(
N
F
s
/
F
(
α
)
)
{\displaystyle \chi '(\alpha ):=\chi (N_{F_{s}/F}(\alpha ))}
Let ψ be some nontrivial additive character of F, and let
ψ
′
{\displaystyle \psi '}
be the additive character on
F
s
{\displaystyle F_{s}}
which is the composition of
ψ
{\displaystyle \psi }
with the trace from Fs to F, that is
ψ
′
(
α
)
:=
ψ
(
T
r
F
s
/
F
(
α
)
)
{\displaystyle \psi '(\alpha ):=\psi (Tr_{F_{s}/F}(\alpha ))}
Let
τ
(
χ
,
ψ
)
=
∑
x
∈
F
χ
(
x
)
ψ
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \tau (\chi ,\psi )=\sum _{x\in F}\chi (x)\psi (x)}
be the Gauss sum over F, and let
τ
(
χ
′
,
ψ
′
)
{\displaystyle \tau (\chi ',\psi ')}
be the Gauss sum over
F
s
{\displaystyle F_{s}}
.
Then the Hasse–Davenport lifting relation states that
(
−
1
)
s
⋅
τ
(
χ
,
ψ
)
s
=
−
τ
(
χ
′
,
ψ
′
)
.
“Hasse–Davenport relation” enters the record as two identities for Gauss sums. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Hasse, Davenport and relation can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Hasse–Davenport relation” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Hasse, Davenport and relation provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q16997822. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1935, 1949 and 1979.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hasse–Davenport relation”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hasse–Davenport relation primary sources, Hasse–Davenport relation archive and Hasse research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hasse–Davenport relation”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hasse–Davenport relation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.