CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Harriet Cornelia Mills

China scholar

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ23750781 ↗
Source-derived summary

Harriet Cornelia Mills (2 April 1920 – 5 March 2016) was a scholar and professor of Chinese language and literature at the University of Michigan from 1966 to 1990. In 1951, she was arrested by the government of the People's Republic of China and held until October, 1955 on charges of spying. On her release she told the western press that she was guilty.

Biography

Harriet C. Mills was born in Tokyo, where her parents were Presbyterian American missionaries, Wilson Plumer Mills and Cornelia Mills (née Seyle). She was taken to Hankou as an infant and attended American primary and secondary schools in Nanjing and Shanghai. Mills completed undergraduate Studies at Wellesley College and graduate studies at Columbia University, where she got a PhD degree in Chinese in 1963, with a thesis titled Lu Hsün: 1927–1936, the years on the left.

In 1947, Mills went to China on a Fulbright Scholarship, studying and doing research on Lu Xun. She also assisted Dorothy Borg, who taught European history at Peking University, and taught classes herself. After the beginning of the Korean War, Mills and other US Americans tried to leave China but were denied exit visas.

Mills was arrested in July 1951 at the same time as several other foreigners, including Antonio Riva, Ruichi Yamaguchi, W. Allyn and Adele Rickett.

Editorial summary

“Harriet Cornelia Mills” enters the record as china scholar. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Harriet, Cornelia and Mills can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1920, 2016, 1966, 1990—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1920-04-02. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Harriet, Cornelia and Mills.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Harriet Cornelia Mills” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Harriet, Cornelia and Mills provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q23750781. VIAF identifies the subject as 287267695. The Library of Congress control number is n2016017052. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1920, 2016, 1966 and 1990.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Harriet Cornelia Mills”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Harriet Cornelia Mills primary sources, Harriet Cornelia Mills archive and Harriet research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Harriet Cornelia Mills”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Harriet Cornelia Mills” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.