CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Harker diagram

plot of oxides of elements found in rocks vs. silica content

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ15819665 ↗
Source-derived summary

In geology, a Harker diagram, a type of a variation diagram, is a plot of oxides of elements found in rocks vs. their silica content.

Typically, in igneous rocks, as silica content increases, iron, magnesium, calcium and titanium oxides decrease in abundance. In contrast, oxides of alkali metals such as Na2O and K2O increase in abundance as silica content increases, while aluminium and phosphorus oxides tend to increase in abundance and then fall.

Such diagrams are used as a visualization tool for exploring the fractionation history of igneous rocks.

Editorial summary

“Harker diagram” enters the record as plot of oxides of elements found in rocks vs. silica content. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Harker, diagram and plot can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 89-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Harker, diagram and plot.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Harker diagram” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Harker, diagram and plot provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15819665. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Harker diagram”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Harker diagram primary sources, Harker diagram archive and Harker research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Harker diagram”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Harker diagram” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.