Incarvillea delavayi
species of plant
Incarvillea delavayi, the so‑called hardy gloxinia or flowering fern, is a species of flowering plant in the family Bignoniaceae, native to western Sichuan and northwest Yunnan provinces of China. The true Gloxinia are members of the Gesneriaceae, while true ferns are flowerless plants which reproduce through spores.
A slug‑prone perennial with fern‑like leaves, it is hardy in USDA zones 5b through 7, and is recommended for borders and rock gardens in part shade to full sun. The original species and a number of cultivars are commercially available, including 'Bees Pink' and 'Snowtop'.
Description
This herbaceous perennial reaches a height of 40 to 60 cm (16 to 24 inches) and spreads to a similar width. It forms thickened underground storage structures that function as energy reserves, resembling the knobby tubers of dahlias. These tuberous roots enable the plant to withstand periods of dormancy and regenerate with vigor each growing season.
The foliage consists of deep green, finely divided leaves arranged in a pinnate pattern. Each leaf can grow up to 45 cm (18 inches) long, giving the plant a lush, textured appearance. These leaves emerge from an elongated flower stalk that may extend to 60 cm (24 inches) in height.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Incarvillea delavayi” is species of plant. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Incarvillea, delavayi and species, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “species of plant” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 17, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q9008251. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Incarvillea delavayi”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Incarvillea delavayi primary sources, Incarvillea delavayi archive and Incarvillea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Incarvillea delavayi”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Incarvillea delavayi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.