Hard Drive (website)
American satirical gaming journalism website

Hard Drive (stylized in all caps) is an American satirical video game news website co-founded in 2017 by the editors of The Hard Times. Due to their similar writing style, Hard Drive is frequently compared to The Onion and was named 'The Onion of video games' by both Vice and Uproxx.
Hard Drive employs both staff and freelance writers.
History
Hard Drive was created in 2017 as a "spin-off" of The Hard Times, a satirical news website, and was co-founded by the latter's editors: CEO Matt Saincome, Jeremy Kaplowitz, Mike Amory, and Mark Roebuck. After The Hard Times' popularity grew, Saincome wanted to start a dedicated gaming vertical in the same style. Hard Drive articles grew popular and were reposted on Twitter.
In 2019, the website published an article in response to The Onion's new gaming-oriented section, the Onion Gaming Network. Fans believed that it was "stolen" from the premise of Hard Drive. Amory told Newsweek that as The Onion's legacy in satire was where they owed their success, "to say the Onion stole from us is like trying to claim The Beatles ripped you off." A spokesperson of The Onion responded to Newsweek, saying that the vertical was a "new creative venture" and that they believed there was "plenty of room" for multiple gaming satire publications to grow.
After The Hard Times was acquired by the Project M Group in 2020, Saincome and its parent company continue to operate Hard Drive.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Hard Drive (website)” as american satirical gaming journalism website. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as american satirical gaming journalism website. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q112872125. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017, 2019 and 2020.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hard Drive (website)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hard Drive (website) primary sources, Hard Drive (website) archive and Hard research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hard Drive (website)”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hard Drive (website)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.