CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Hans Schöler

Czech luger

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 2, 2020
Entity authorityQ5650713 ↗
Source-derived summary

Hans Schöler was an Ethnic German luger who competed for Czechoslovakia in the mid-1930s. He a bronze medal in the men's doubles event at the 1935 European luge championships in Krynica, Poland.

References

FIL-Luge.org list of European luge champions (in German) - Accessed January 31, 2008.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Hans Schöler” as czech luger. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1935, 2008—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Hans, Schöler and Czech can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as czech luger. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 2, 2020. The linked authority identifier is Q5650713. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1935 and 2008.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Hans Schöler”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Hans Schöler primary sources, Hans Schöler archive and Hans research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hans Schöler”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Hans Schöler” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.