CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Hanneliese Spitz

Austrian canoeist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 9, 2024
Entity authorityQ5649084 ↗
Source-derived summary

Hanneliese Spitz (born 24 November 1941) is an Austrian sprint canoer who competed in the mid-1960s. She won a bronze medal in the K-1 500 m event at the 1963 ICF Canoe Sprint World Championships in Jajce.

Spitz also finished sixth in the K-1 500 m event at the 1964 Summer Olympics in Tokyo.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Hanneliese Spitz” as austrian canoeist. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1941, 1963, 1964—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1941-11-24. The account is most persuasive where Hanneliese, Spitz and Austrian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as austrian canoeist. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 9, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q5649084. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1941, 1963 and 1964.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Hanneliese Spitz”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Hanneliese Spitz primary sources, Hanneliese Spitz archive and Hanneliese research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hanneliese Spitz”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Hanneliese Spitz” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.