Handley Page Basic Trainer
type of aircraft
The Handley Page Basic Trainer (H.P.R.2) was a British training aircraft of the 1940s. It was a single-engine, low-wing monoplane with a fixed tailwheel undercarriage.
Development
The H.P.R.2 was developed by Handley Page Reading Ltd as a basic trainer in response to Air Ministry Specification T16/48 for a trainer to replace the ageing Percival Prentice.
The Basic Trainer first flew in May 1950. Testing showed it to be a trickier and less forgiving aircraft than the rival Percival P.56. Although Handley Page were confident that the H.P.R.2 could be improved, the Air Ministry elected to order the P.56 into production as the Provost. Two prototypes (WE496 c/n HPR.142 and WE505 c/n HPR.143) were built and flown but no orders resulted.
Specifications (Basic Trainer)
Data from Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1951–52General characteristics
Crew: two
Length: 29 ft 11 in (9.12 m)
Wingspan: 37 ft 0 in (11.28 m)
Height: 9 ft 6.5 in (2.908 m)
Wing area: 223 sq ft (20.7 m2)
Max takeoff weight: 4,421 lb (2,005 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Armstrong Siddeley Cheetah XVIII 7-cyl.
The public source identifies “Handley Page Basic Trainer” as type of aircraft. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Handley, Page and Basic.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Handley Page Basic Trainer”, the useful work is to connect “type of aircraft” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5647489. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1950 and 1951.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Handley Page Basic Trainer”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Handley Page Basic Trainer primary sources, Handley Page Basic Trainer archive and Handley research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Handley Page Basic Trainer”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Handley Page Basic Trainer” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.