CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Halar

historical region of western India

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ11925162
Source-derived summary

Halar (Haalaar) is a historical region of western India, located by the Gulf of Kutch coast on the northwestern area of Nawanagar, now Jamnagar, in Gujarat State, on Saurashtra peninsula, roughly corresponding to the present Jamnagar District, Devbhumi Dwarka district, Morbi District and Rajkot District.

In 1901 it had an area of 19,365 km2 and a population of 764,992 inhabitants.

History

The name is derived from Jam Sri Halaji Jadeja who is supposed to be the 9th-generation grandfather of Jam Sri Rawalji Lakhaji Jadeja (who is the founder of the region and the first king to reign in the region); Halar was first established with this name by Jam Shri Rawalji Lakhaji, a Jadeja Rajput, in 1540.

During the British Raj Halar region was the western of the four prants or historical districts of Kathiawar, belonging to the Bombay Presidency, the others being Gohelwar (southeast), Jhalawar prant(north) and Sorath (southwest).

Princely States in Halar region

At that time the region included numerous princely states belonging to the Kathiawar Agency, mostly ruled by Jadeja Rajputs.

Its salute states were :

First Class states :

Nawanagar, title Maharaja Jam Sahib, Hereditary salute of 15-guns (19-guns locally)

Gondal, title Maharaja, Hereditary salute of 11-guns

Morvi, title Maharaja, Hereditary salute of 11-guns

Second Class states :

Dhrol, title Thakore Sahib, Hereditary salute of 9-guns

Rajkot, title Thakore Sahib, Hereditary salute of 9-guns

Its major non-salute states (mostly minor, usually several village) included :

Fourth Class states : Kotda Sangani, Malia, Virpur

Fifth Class states : Gavridad, Jalia Devani, Kotharia, Rajpara, Mengni, Pal

Sixth Class states : Bhadva.

Seventh Class states : Khirasra, Lodhika

Other non-salute state, granted no class, were :

multiple villages, yet mostly minor except the first : DHRAFA State (known as DHRAFA 24C, means 24 villages under Dhrafa's rule) Amran, Kanpar Ishwaria, Mulila Deri, Satodad Vavdi, Sisang Chandli,

single village, petty states : Bhalgam Baldhoi, Kansiali, Kotda Nayani, Makaji Meghpar, Virvao.

Bibliography

Târikh-i-Soraṭh: A History of the Provinces of Soraṭh and Hâlâr. 1882.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Halar” as historical region of western India. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1901, 1540, 1882—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Halar, historical and region can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as historical region of western India. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11925162. Authority coordinates are 22.783, 70.083. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1901, 1540 and 1882.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Halar”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Halar primary sources, Halar archive and Halar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Halar”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Halar” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.