CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Haguard horse

horse breed

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 13, 2025
Entity authorityQ57396208 ↗
Source-derived summary

Haguard horse, also known as the Hague pony or bidet de la Hague, is a breed of bidet horse native to the natural region of La Hague, in the Manche in Normandy.

Used as a packhorse, saddle horse and by the postal services, this little horse is known for its particular hereditary gait, the pas relevé. It won many trotting races near Cherbourg, notably in 1835 and 1836. Formerly bred in the hilly, marshy areas of the Cherbourg, Valognes and Coutances arrondissements, the Haguard became extinct as a result of road improvements and cross-breeding with Thoroughbreds and racing trotters. A small population was probably transferred to the Mayenne region, helping to create the French saddle pony in the 1970s.

Origin of name

The information available on this extinct horse breed is dated. The breed is known as 'Haguard', 'bidet de la Hague', and 'gaited horse', according to Jean-Henri Magne. However, zootechnicians Alexandre-Bernard Vallon and Paul Diffloth dissociate the 'gaited bidet' from the 'Hague pony', both of which they list as part of the Cotentin horse breeds, along with the black carrossier and the passeur. The gaited bidet, or Norman letter carrier, is described by Vallon as being larger in stature.

Characteristics

Smaller than other Norman horses, Haguards are described as "short, small, nervous, tireless, hard and solid as the granite on which they were bred":

"Here is the Hague pony, as hard as the granite of the Tourlaville dunes."

Bernadette Lizet describes them as ponies, and Daniel Roche as bidets.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Haguard horse” as horse breed. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Haguard, horse and breed.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1835, 1836—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Haguard, horse and breed providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Haguard horse”, the useful work is to connect “horse breed” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q57396208. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1835 and 1836.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Haguard horse”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Haguard horse primary sources, Haguard horse archive and Haguard research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Haguard horse”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Haguard horse” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.