CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Haenamichnus

ichnogenus of pterosaur

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ5638279 ↗
Source-derived summary

Haenamichnus is an ichnogenus of probable azhdarchid pterosaurs from the Late Cretaceous (Campanian) of South Korea. The type and only ichnospecies is H. uhangriensis, representing the largest known trace fossil made by a pterosaur.

Discovery and naming

The excavation of tracksites in the Uhangri Formation was conducted from 1996 to 1998, and 443 pterosaur footprints were found in the upper part of the formation. In 2002, paleontologists Koo-Geun Hwang, Min Huh, Martin Lockley, David Unwin and Joanna Wright named the type ichnospecies Haenamichnus uhangriensis, based on fossil tracks they found in the Uhangri Formation of South Korea. The ichnogeneric name means 'trace of Haenam County', while the ichnospecific name is in reference to the Uhangri Formation. The age of the Uhangri Formation is estimated around 81 to 79 million years ago during the Campanian stage. Some Campanian azhdarchid tracks found in the Cerro del Pueblo Formation of Mexico and the Wapiti Formation of Canada might belong to this ichnogenus.

Formerly assigned ichnospecies

A putative second ichnospecies, H. gainensis, was reported from the Early Cretaceous (Albian) Haman Formation, but this ichnotaxon is now reassigned to as the archosaur trace fossil Batrachopus cf. grandis, made by either a bipedal crocodylomorph or therizinosaur.

Classification

The trackmaker of Haenamichnus uhangriensis is probably a large azhdarchid pterosaur, based on large pes print up to 350 mm in length, likely reaching 10 m (33 ft) in wingspan, 3 m (9.8 ft) in height and 145 kg (320 lb) in body mass, more than ten times heavier than the Kori bustard.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Haenamichnus” as ichnogenus of pterosaur. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996, 1998, 2002—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Haenamichnus, ichnogenus and pterosaur can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as ichnogenus of pterosaur. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5638279. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1996, 1998 and 2002.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Haenamichnus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Haenamichnus primary sources, Haenamichnus archive and Haenamichnus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Haenamichnus”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Haenamichnus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.