CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Habenaria chlorosepala

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 23, 2025
Entity authorityQ15479366 ↗
Source-derived summary

Habenaria chlorosepala, commonly known as the green-hooded rein orchid, is a species of orchid that is endemic to a small area in far north Queensland. It has two or three leaves at its base and up to twenty small green and white flowers.

Description

Habenaria chlorosepala is a tuberous, perennial herb with two or three bluish-green, erect leaves, 20–60 mm (0.8–2 in) long and 6–10 mm (0.2–0.4 in) wide. Between eight and twenty green flowers with a white labellum, 8–10 mm (0.3–0.4 in) long and 5–6 mm (0.20–0.24 in) wide are borne on a flowering stem 200–530 mm (8–20 in) tall. The dorsal sepal and petals overlap at their bases and form a hood over the column. The sepals and petals are about 5 mm (0.2 in) long and 3 mm (0.1 in) wide, the lateral sepals spread widely apart from each other. The labellum is 4.5–5 mm (0.18–0.20 in) long and 8–10 mm (0.3–0.4 in) wide with three lobes, the side lobes arranged at about 90° to the middle lobe. The labellum spur is white, 7–8 mm (0.28–0.31 in) long, about 1 mm (0.04 in) wide and curves forward. Flowering occurs between January and April.

Taxonomy and naming

Habenaria chlorosepala was first formally described in 1998 by David Jones from a specimen collected near Cooktown by Lewis Roberts in 1993 and the description was published in The Orchadian.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Habenaria chlorosepala” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Habenaria, chlorosepala and species.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1998, 1993—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Habenaria, chlorosepala and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Habenaria chlorosepala”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 23, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q15479366. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998 and 1993.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Habenaria chlorosepala”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Habenaria chlorosepala primary sources, Habenaria chlorosepala archive and Habenaria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Habenaria chlorosepala”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Habenaria chlorosepala” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.