CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

HMAS Rushcutter (M 80)

1986 Bay-class minehunter

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ5630548 ↗
Source-derived summary

HMAS Rushcutter (M 80) was one of two Bay class minehunters built for the Royal Australian Navy by Carrington Slipways at its Ramsay Fibreglass facility in Tomago. It was launched on 8 May 1986 and commissioned on 1 November 1986. It was decommissioned on 14 August 2001.

It and sister ship HMAS Shoalwater were sold in 2002 for service in the Persian Gulf. By 2013, it had been sold and returned to Sydney, being laid up in Rozelle Bay. By 2017 it was laid up in Botany Bay.

Editorial summary

“HMAS Rushcutter (M 80)” enters the record as 1986 Bay-class minehunter. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what HMAS, Rushcutter and Bay-class can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1986, 2001, 2002, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around HMAS, Rushcutter and Bay-class.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“HMAS Rushcutter (M 80)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, HMAS, Rushcutter and Bay-class provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5630548. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1986, 2001, 2002 and 2013.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “HMAS Rushcutter (M 80)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow HMAS Rushcutter (M 80) primary sources, HMAS Rushcutter (M 80) archive and HMAS research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “HMAS Rushcutter (M 80)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “HMAS Rushcutter (M 80)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.