Hartree–Fock method
method of approximation for the determination of the wave function and the energy of a quantum many-body system in a stationary state

In computational physics and chemistry, the Hartree–Fock (HF) method is used for approximating the wave function and the energy of a quantum many-body system in a stationary state. It is named after Douglas Hartree and Vladimir Fock.
The Hartree–Fock method often assumes that the exact
N
{\displaystyle N}
-body wave function of the system can be approximated by a single Slater determinant (in the case where the particles are fermions) or by a single permanent (in the case of bosons) of
N
{\displaystyle N}
spin-orbitals. By invoking the variational method, one can derive a set of
N
{\displaystyle N}
coupled equations for the
N
{\displaystyle N}
spin orbitals. A solution of these equations yields the Hartree–Fock wave function and energy of the system. Hartree–Fock approximation is an instance of mean-field theory, where neglecting higher-order fluctuations in order parameter allows interaction terms to be replaced with quadratic terms, obtaining exactly solvable Hamiltonians.
Especially in the older literature, the Hartree–Fock method is also called the self-consistent field method (SCF). In deriving what is now called the Hartree equation as an approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation, Hartree required the final field as computed from the charge distribution to be "self-consistent" with the assumed initial field. Thus, self-consistency was a requirement of the solution. The solutions to the non-linear Hartree–Fock equations also behave as if each particle is subjected to the mean field created by all other particles (see the Fock operator below), and hence the terminology continued.
“Hartree–Fock method” enters the record as method of approximation for the determination of the wave function and the energy of a quantum many-body system in a stationary state. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Hartree, Fock and method can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Hartree–Fock method” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Hartree, Fock and method provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7879841. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hartree–Fock method”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hartree–Fock method primary sources, Hartree–Fock method archive and Hartree research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hartree–Fock method”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hartree–Fock method” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.