Diacetylene
chemical compound
Diacetylene (also known as butadiyne) is the organic compound with the formula C4H2 or H−C≡C−C≡C−H. It is the simplest compound containing two triple bonds. It is first in the series of polyynes, which are of theoretical but not of practical interest.
Occurrence
Diacetylene has been identified in the atmosphere of Titan and in the protoplanetary nebula CRL 618 by its characteristic vibrational spectrum. It is proposed to arise by a reaction between acetylene and the ethynyl radical (C2H), which is produced when acetylene undergoes photolysis. This radical can in turn attack the triple bond in acetylene and react efficiently even at low temperatures. Diacetylene has also been detected on the Moon.
Preparation
This compound may be made by the dehydrohalogenation of 1,4-dichloro-2-butyne by potassium hydroxide (in alcoholic medium) at ~70 °C:
Cl−CH2−C≡C−CH2−Cl + 2 KOH → H−C≡C−C≡C−H + 2 KCl + 2 H2O
The bis(trimethylsilyl)-protected derivative may be prepared by the Hay coupling of (trimethylsilyl)acetylene:
2 (CH3)3Si−C≡C−H → (CH3)3Si−C≡C−C≡C−Si(CH3) + H2
See also
Acetylene
Diiodobutadiyne
Butenyne
Hydrocarbon
References
Further reading
Maretina, Irina A; Trofimov, Boris A (2000). "Diacetylene: a candidate for industrially important reactions". Russian Chemical Reviews. 69 (7): 591.
“Diacetylene” enters the record as chemical compound. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Diacetylene, chemical and compound can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Diacetylene” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Diacetylene, chemical and compound provides the most credible route into that argument.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q422802. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Diacetylene”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Diacetylene primary sources, Diacetylene archive and Diacetylene research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Diacetylene”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Diacetylene” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.