Çubukspor
Turkish association football club
Çubukspor Futbol AŞ (formerly Gölbaşıspor) is a football club located in Çubuk in Ankara. Not be confused with Çubuk 1959 Spor Kulübü (Çubukspor 1959).
History
Blue-yellow Çubukspor Futbol AŞ is a team of the Ankara Province. While the team, which was founded as Pursaklarspor, played in the amateur leagues, in 2007, Altındağ Municipality took over the competitor rights of Kızılcahamam Belediyespor. In the same season the club managed to get promoted in their first season in the TFF Third League winning the promotion play-offs of the 2008-2009 season. On July 4, 2011, Pursaklarspor changed its name to Kızılcahamamspor A.Ş.. During this period, the matches were played in Kızılcahamam district. Before the 2014-2015 season, Kızılcahamamspor changed its name to Gölbaşıspor.
At the beginning of the 2016-2017 season, due to the fact that the well-established club Çubukspor (later renamed to Çubukspor 1959) could not participate in the leagues that season, Gölbaşıspor changed its name for the 3rd time and took the name Çubukspor Futbol A.Ş. and moved to the Çubuk district.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Çubukspor” as turkish association football club. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as turkish association football club. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1797544. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1959, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Çubukspor”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Çubukspor primary sources, Çubukspor archive and Çubukspor research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Çubukspor”?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Çubukspor” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.