CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Gábor Cseh

Hungarian canoeist (1912-1979)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 11, 2024
Entity authorityQ5625723 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gábor Cseh (24 December 1916 – 27 July 1979) was a Hungarian sprint canoeist who competed in the late 1930s. At the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin, he finished 12th in the K-2 10000 m event while being eliminated in the heats of the K-2 1000 m event.

Editorial summary

“Gábor Cseh” enters the record as hungarian canoeist (1912-1979). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Gábor, Cseh and Hungarian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1916, 1979, 1936, 1000—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1912-12-23. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Gábor, Cseh and Hungarian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Gábor Cseh” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Gábor, Cseh and Hungarian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 11, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q5625723. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1916, 1979, 1936 and 1000.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gábor Cseh”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gábor Cseh primary sources, Gábor Cseh archive and Gábor research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gábor Cseh”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gábor Cseh” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.