CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Gymnobela daphnelloides

species of mollusc

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ5624539 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gymnobela daphnelloides is a species of sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusk in the family Raphitomidae.

Description

The length of the shell attains 23 mm, its diameter 10 mm.

(Original description) The small, thin, polished shell has a pointed simisigera protoconch of 3½ whorls and six subsequent whorls. The protoconch is bright yellow-brown, often caducous, leaving the white internal callus to represent it, which being molded on the interior of the protoconch whorls, is polished and smooth, while the original protoconch has an oblique reticular curved sculpture. The sculpture is much like that of Spergo glandiniformis, but having the whorls appressed at the suture lower on the antecedent whorl, the riblets more prominent, less oblique, and higher on the whorl, the fasciole more deeply impressed and its sculpture indicating a deeper sinus, and the fine spiral grooving continuous and uniform over the whole surface of the shell. The whorls are rounded, the body whorl inflated with the outer lip greatly produced, as in Daphnella, and the sinus pronounced. The columella is straight and brown tinted. The siphonal canal is shallow and narrow. The outer lip is thin, smooth and glassy within, sharp edged.

Distribution

This marine species occurs off Hawaii and East Africa.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Gymnobela daphnelloides” as species of mollusc. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Gymnobela, daphnelloides and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 203-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Gymnobela, daphnelloides and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Gymnobela daphnelloides”, the useful work is to connect “species of mollusc” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5624539. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gymnobela daphnelloides”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gymnobela daphnelloides primary sources, Gymnobela daphnelloides archive and Gymnobela research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gymnobela daphnelloides”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gymnobela daphnelloides” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.