CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Gustavo Cardoso

Portuguese academic

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ5621366 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gustavo Cardoso is Full Professor of Communication Sciences at ISCTE - Lisbon University Institute, Portugal and a member of the Innovation Lab Annenberg School of Communication and World Internet Project both based at the University of Southern California.

He was also a visiting professor at the IN3 in Barcelona and Directeur d'Études Associes at FMSH Paris.

Currently he directs the Doctoral Program in Communication Sciences at ISCTE-IUL and the Postdegree in Journalism in the same institution. He is also member of the Board of OberCom (Communication Observatory) and editor-in-chief of OBS Journal. His reflection analysis on politics, economics and Portuguese culture include "O Poder de Mudar" (Tinta da China, 2014) and "Inovar Portugal: 20 ideas para 2020" (Campo das letras, 2005).

His research in the communication studies include "The Media in the Network Society" (Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in Portugal; FGV in Brazil, and UOC Press in Spain) and the edited volumes "Network Society : From Knowledge to Policy "(Johns Hopkins University, 2006)," World Wide Internet: Changing Societies, Economies and Culture 's (University of Macau Press, 2010.) "Aftermath" (Oxford University Press 2012 ), "A Sociedade dos Ecrãs" (Tinta da China, 2013), "Piracy Cultures" (IJOC, 2014), "O livro, o leitor e a leitura digital" (Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2015) and "A Sociedade em Rede em Portugal: uma década de transição" (Almedina, 2015). Since 2013 he is a member of the research network "The Crisis of Europe", hosted by the College d'Études Mondiales, on the political, cultural and economic changes underway in European societies and in the European Union.

Regular columnist in the Portuguese newspaper Público he also comments weekly in the News Channel TVI24 on emerging issues in the current political, economic and cultural dimensions.

Recent publications

Cardoso, Gustavo and Di Fátima, Branco (2013), Movimento em rede e protestos no Brasil. Qual gigante acordou?, Revista Eco-Pós, Dossiê Mídia, Intelectuais e Política, Vol.

Editorial summary

“Gustavo Cardoso” enters the record as portuguese academic. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Gustavo, Cardoso and Portuguese can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014, 2020, 2005, 2006—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1969. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Gustavo, Cardoso and Portuguese.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Gustavo Cardoso” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Gustavo, Cardoso and Portuguese provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5621366. VIAF identifies the subject as 85282206. The Library of Congress control number is n2004141665. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2014, 2020, 2005 and 2006.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gustavo Cardoso”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gustavo Cardoso primary sources, Gustavo Cardoso archive and Gustavo research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gustavo Cardoso”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gustavo Cardoso” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.