CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Guichenotia

genus of plants

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ5230558
Source-derived summary

Guichenotia is a genus of 17 species of flowering plants in the family Malvaceae that is endemic to the south west of Western Australia. Plants in the genus Guichenotia are shrubs with simple, linear to oblong leaves with leaf-like stipules at the base of the petiole, the flowers bisexual with three bracteoles at the base of the sepals, and five petal-like sepals, the petals sometimes absent. The fruit is a capsule usually containing 15 seeds.

The genus was first formally described in 1821 by Jaques Étienne Gay in Mémoires du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle. The first species Gay described was Guichenotia ledifolia. The genus name honours Antoine Guichenot, gardener's boy on the 1801–1803 French scientific voyage to Australia under Nicolas Baudin.

Species list

The following species of Guichenotia are accepted by the Australian Plant Census as at 22 March 2022:

Guichenotia alba Keighery

Guichenotia angustifolia (Turcz.) Druce

Guichenotia anota C.F.Wilkins

Guichenotia apetala A.S.George

Guichenotia asteriskos C.F.Wilkins

Guichenotia astropletha C.F.Wilkins

Guichenotia basiviridis C.F.Wilkins

Guichenotia glandulosa C.F.Wilkins

Guichenotia impudica C.F.Wilkins

Guichenotia intermedia C.F.Wilkins

Guichenotia ledifolia J.Gay

Guichenotia macrantha Turcz. - large-flowered guichenotia

Guichenotia micrantha (Steetz) Benth. - small flowered guichenotia

Guichenotia quasicalva C.F.Wilkins

Guichenotia sarotes Benth.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Guichenotia” as genus of plants. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1821, 1801, 1803, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Guichenotia, genus and plants can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as genus of plants. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5230558. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1821, 1801, 1803 and 2022.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Guichenotia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Guichenotia primary sources, Guichenotia archive and Guichenotia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Guichenotia”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Guichenotia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.