CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll

Norwegian politician (1924-2005)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ5614693 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll (18 January 1924 – 17 May 2005) was a Norwegian politician for the Liberal Party.

She served as a deputy representative to the Norwegian Parliament from Aust-Agder during the terms 1965–1969.

References

"Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll" (in Norwegian). Storting.

Editorial summary

“Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll” enters the record as norwegian politician (1924-2005). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Gudrun, Tandberg and Høykoll can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1924, 2005, 1965, 1969—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1924-01-18. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Gudrun, Tandberg and Høykoll.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Gudrun, Tandberg and Høykoll provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5614693. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1924, 2005, 1965 and 1969.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll primary sources, Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll archive and Gudrun research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gudrun Tandberg Høykoll” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.