Guangchengzi
deity
Guangchengzi (simplified Chinese: 广成子; traditional Chinese: 廣成子; pinyin: Guǎngchéngzǐ; Wade–Giles: Kuang ch'eng-tzu) is a legendary Daoist immortal associated with the Yellow Emperor and a character in the Chinese novel Fengshen Yanyi.
In Daoist tradition
The earliest surviving account of Guangchengzi appears in the Zhuangzi. In the chapter "In the World Among Men" (在宥), the Yellow Emperor hears that Guangchengzi is living at Mount Kongtong and visits him to ask about the Dao. Guangchengzi initially rejects the Yellow Emperor's questions, saying that his concern with governing the world is too superficial for discussion of the highest Dao. The Yellow Emperor withdraws from public affairs for three months before returning to ask about cultivating the body. Guangchengzi then teaches him about stillness, preserving the spirit, and cultivating longevity. He says that he has practiced his method for 1,200 years without his body declining.
A later biography in Ge Hong's Shenxian Zhuan presents Guangchengzi explicitly as an ancient immortal living in a stone chamber on Mount Kongtong. It repeats the story of the Yellow Emperor's visit and Guangchengzi's teaching on cultivating the body and attaining longevity.
The Taishang Laojun Kaitian Jing gives a different account of Guangchengzi's identity.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Guangchengzi” is deity. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Guangchengzi and deity, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “deity” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q986081. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Guangchengzi”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Guangchengzi primary sources, Guangchengzi archive and Guangchengzi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Guangchengzi”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Guangchengzi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.