CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Group of GF(2)-type

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 14, 2025
Entity authorityQ5611252
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, specifically finite group theory, a group of GF(2)-type is a group with an involution centralizer whose generalized Fitting subgroup is a group of symplectic type (Gorenstein 1982, definition 1.45).

As the name suggests, many of the groups of Lie type over the field with 2 elements are groups of GF(2)-type. Also 16 of the 26 sporadic groups are of GF(2)-type, suggesting that in some sense sporadic groups are somehow related to special properties of the field with 2 elements.

Timmesfeld (1978) showed roughly that groups of GF(2)-type can be subdivided into 8 types. The groups of each of these 8 types were classified by various authors. They consist mainly of groups of Lie type with all roots of the same length over the field with 2 elements, but also include many exceptional cases, including the majority of the sporadic groups.

Smith (1980) gave a survey of this work.

Smith (1979, p.279) gives a table of simple groups containing a large extraspecial 2-group.

Bibliography

Gorenstein, D. (1982), Finite simple groups, University Series in Mathematics, New York: Plenum Publishing Corp., ISBN 978-0-306-40779-6, MR 0698782

Smith, Stephen D. (1979), "Large extraspecial subgroups of widths 4 and 6", Journal of Algebra, 58 (2): 251–281, doi:10.1016/0021-8693(79)90160-1, ISSN 0021-8693, MR 0540638

Smith, Stephen D. (1980), "The classification of finite groups with large extraspecial 2-subgroups", The Santa Cruz Conference on Finite Groups (Univ. California, Santa Cruz, Calif., 1979), Proc.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Group of GF(2)-type” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Group, -type and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1982, 1978, 1980, 1979—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Group, -type and Open-knowledge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5611252. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1982, 1978, 1980 and 1979.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Group of GF(2)-type”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Group of GF(2)-type primary sources, Group of GF(2)-type archive and Group research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Group of GF(2)-type”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Group of GF(2)-type” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.