CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Gross–Koblitz formula

Expresses a Gauss sum using a product of values of the p-adic gamma function

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 17, 2024
Entity authorityQ5610624 ↗
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the Gross–Koblitz formula, introduced by Gross and Koblitz (1979) expresses a Gauss sum using a product of values of the p-adic gamma function. It is an analog of the Chowla–Selberg formula for the usual gamma function. It implies the Hasse–Davenport relation and generalizes the Stickelberger theorem.

Boyarsky (1980) gave another proof of the Gross–Koblitz formula ("Boyarsky" being a pseudonym of Bernard Dwork), and

Robert (2001) gave an elementary proof.

Statement

The Gross–Koblitz formula states that the Gauss sum

τ

{\displaystyle \tau }

can be given in terms of the

p

{\displaystyle p}

-adic gamma function

Γ

p

{\displaystyle \Gamma _{p}}

by

τ

q

(

r

)

=

−

π

s

p

(

r

)

∏

0

≤

i

<

f

Γ

p

(

r

(

i

)

q

−

1

)

{\displaystyle \tau _{q}(r)=-\pi ^{s_{p}(r)}\prod _{0\leq i<f}\Gamma _{p}\!\left({\frac {r^{(i)}}{q-1}}\right)}

where

q

{\displaystyle q}

is a power

p

f

{\displaystyle p^{f}}

of a prime

p

{\displaystyle p}

,

r

{\displaystyle r}

is an integer with

0

≤

r

<

q

−

1

{\displaystyle 0\leq r<q-1}

,

r

(

i

)

{\displaystyle r^{(i)}}

is the integer whose base-

p

{\displaystyle p}

expansion is a cyclic permutation of the

f

{\displaystyle f}

digits of

r

{\displaystyle r}

by

i

{\displaystyle i}

positions,

s

p

(

r

)

{\displaystyle s_{p}(r)}

is the sum of the base-

p

{\displaystyle p}

digits of

r

{\displaystyle r}

,

τ

q

(

r

)

=

∑

a

q

−

1

=

1

a

−

r

ζ

π

Tr

(

a

)

{\displaystyle \tau _{q}(r)=\sum _{a^{q-1}=1}a^{-r}\zeta _{\pi }^{{\text{Tr}}(a)}}

, where the sum is over roots of unity in the extension

Q

p

(

π

)

{\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} _{p}(\pi )}

,

π

{\displaystyle \pi }

satisfies

π

p

−

1

=

−

p

{\displaystyle \pi ^{p-1}=-p}

, and

ζ

π

{\displaystyle \zeta _{\pi }}

is the

p

{\displaystyle p}

th root of unity congruent to

1

+

π

{\displaystyle 1+\pi }

modulo

π

2

{\displaystyle \pi ^{2}}

.

References

Boyarsky, Maurizio (1980), "p-adic gamma functions and Dwork cohomology", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 257 (2): 359–369, doi:10.2307/1998301, ISSN 0002-9947, JSTOR 1998301, MR 0552263

Cohen, Henri (2007). Number Theory – Volume II: Analytic and Modern Tools. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 240.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Gross–Koblitz formula” is expresses a Gauss sum using a product of values of the p-adic gamma function. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Gross, Koblitz and formula, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1979, 1980, 2001, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Gross, Koblitz and formula is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “expresses a Gauss sum using a product of values of the p-adic gamma function” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 17, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q5610624. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1979, 1980, 2001 and 2007.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gross–Koblitz formula”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gross–Koblitz formula primary sources, Gross–Koblitz formula archive and Gross research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gross–Koblitz formula”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gross–Koblitz formula” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.