CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Blue spruce

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ146025
Source-derived summary

The blue spruce (Picea pungens), also commonly known as Colorado spruce or Colorado blue spruce, is a species of spruce tree native to North America in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. It is noted for its often strongly glaucous blue-green needles, and has therefore been used as an ornamental tree in many places far beyond its native range.

Description

In the wild, Picea pungens grows to as much as 50 meters (164 ft) in height, but more typically 30 m (98 ft) tall. When planted in parks and gardens it most often grows 9 to 18 m (30 to 60 ft) tall with a spread of 3 to 6 m (10 to 20 ft). It has scaly gray-brown bark with a slight amount of a cinnamon-red undertone on its trunk, not as rough as an Engelmann spruce. On older trees the trunk bark becomes deeply furrowed and scaly. The trunk diameter may reach as much as 1.5 m (4.9 ft). The root system is of the blue spruce is dense and compact, lacking a taproot.

Blue spruce is a conifer with a conical crown when young, but more open and irregular in shape as it becomes older. The stout branches grow out horizontally in well defined whorls, but lower branches droop downwards as trees age.

Editorial summary

“Blue spruce” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Blue, spruce and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 218-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Blue, spruce and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Blue spruce” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Blue, spruce and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q146025. The Library of Congress control number is sh2006003883. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Blue spruce”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Blue spruce primary sources, Blue spruce archive and Blue research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Blue spruce”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Blue spruce” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.