Gram–Schmidt process
method for orthonormalising a set of vectors

In mathematics, particularly linear algebra and numerical analysis, the Gram–Schmidt process or Gram-Schmidt algorithm is a way of finding a set of two or more vectors that are perpendicular to each other.
By technical definition, it is a method of constructing an orthonormal basis from a set of vectors in an inner product space, most commonly the Euclidean space
R
n
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
equipped with the standard inner product. The Gram–Schmidt process takes a finite, linearly independent set of vectors
S
=
{
v
1
,
…
,
v
k
}
{\displaystyle S=\{\mathbf {v} _{1},\ldots ,\mathbf {v} _{k}\}}
for k ≤ n and generates an orthogonal set
S
′
=
{
u
1
,
…
,
u
k
}
{\displaystyle S'=\{\mathbf {u} _{1},\ldots ,\mathbf {u} _{k}\}}
that spans the same
k
{\displaystyle k}
-dimensional subspace of
R
n
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
as
S
{\displaystyle S}
.
The method is named after Jørgen Pedersen Gram and Erhard Schmidt, but Pierre-Simon Laplace had been familiar with it before Gram and Schmidt. In the theory of Lie group decompositions, it is generalized by the Iwasawa decomposition.
The application of the Gram–Schmidt process to the column vectors of a full column rank matrix yields the QR decomposition (it is decomposed into an orthogonal and a triangular matrix).
Description
The vector projection of a vector
v
{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} }
on a nonzero vector
u
{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} }
is defined as
proj
u
(
v
)
=
⟨
v
,
u
⟩
⟨
u
,
u
⟩
u
,
{\displaystyle \operatorname {proj} _{\mathbf {u} }(\mathbf {v} )={\frac {\langle \mathbf {v} ,\mathbf {u} \rangle }{\langle \mathbf {u} ,\mathbf {u} \rangle }}\,\mathbf {u} ,}
where
⟨
v
,
u
⟩
{\displaystyle \langle \mathbf {v} ,\mathbf {u} \rangle }
denotes the dot product of the vectors
u
{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} }
and
v
{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} }
. This means that
proj
u
(
v
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {proj} _{\mathbf {u} }(\mathbf {v} )}
is the orthogonal projection of
v
{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} }
onto the line spanned by
u
{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} }
. If
u
{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} }
is the zero vector, then
proj
u
(
v
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {proj} _{\mathbf {u} }(\mathbf {v} )}
is defined as the zero vector.
Given
k
{\displaystyle k}
nonzero linearly-independent vectors
v
1
,
…
,
v
k
{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} _{1},\ldots ,\mathbf {v} _{k}}
the Gram–Schmidt process defines the vectors
u
1
,
…
,
u
k
{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} _{1},\ldots ,\mathbf {u} _{k}}
as follows:
u
1
=
v
1
,
e
1
=
u
1
‖
u
1
‖
u
2
=
v
2
−
proj
u
1
(
v
2
)
,
e
2
=
u
2
‖
u
2
‖
u
3
=
v
3
−
proj
u
1
(
v
3
)
−
proj
u
2
(
v
3
)
,
e
3
=
u
3
‖
u
3
‖
u
4
=
v
4
−
proj
u
1
(
v
4
)
−
proj
u
2
(
v
4
)
−
proj
u
3
(
v
4
)
,
e
4
=
u
4
‖
u
4
‖
⋮
⋮
u
k
=
v
k
−
∑
j
=
1
k
−
1
proj
u
j
(
v
k
)
,
e
k
=
u
k
‖
u
k
‖
.
The public source identifies “Gram–Schmidt process” as method for orthonormalising a set of vectors. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Gram, Schmidt and process.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Gram–Schmidt process”, the useful work is to connect “method for orthonormalising a set of vectors” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q475239. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Gram–Schmidt process”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Gram–Schmidt process primary sources, Gram–Schmidt process archive and Gram research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gram–Schmidt process”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Gram–Schmidt process” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.