CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Gothabhaya of Anuradhapura

Sri Lankan king of Anuradhapura from 254 to 267

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ5587781
Source-derived summary

Gothabhaya, also known as Meghavannabhaya, Gothakabhaya and Goluaba, was a king of the Anuradhapura Kingdom of Sri Lanka whose reign lasted from 249 to 262 AD. During his reign, Gothabhaya renovated several temples and monasteries and also built a new temple. He is the last of three princes who seized the throne from King Vijaya Kumara and ruled the country. He is known for banishing 60 Buddhist monks who followed teaching contradictory to Theravada, and also for rebelling against his friend Samghabodhi to seize the throne himself.

Early life

Prince Gothabhaya came from the Lambakanna dynasty, he was invited by the previous ruler called King Vijaya Kumara to the palace along with Prince Sangha Tissa and Prince Sangha Bodhi, by hearing a prediction Prince Gothabhaya had been interested on capturing the throne of the kingdom and with the help of his friend Prince Sangha Tissa which at the time of the conspiracy had held the position of commander in chief of the army, together they killed the king.

Legend

According to a legend a blind man had predicted that the three Princes would reign over the kingdom.

Rebellion against the former king

King Sangha Bodhi was famous among the citizens due to his religious works, Prince Gothabhaya at the time held the treasurer position of the kingdom was jealous of the king and decided to capture the throne for himself thus he rebelled during the kings reign and the king decided not to fight against Prince Gothabhaya due to the concern over the wellbeing of the common people, he decided to leave the throne and become a ascetic and stay in the forest.

Banishing of Mahayana cult

During the kings reign the Mahayana monks started spreading their version of Buddhism which was considered contradicting by the Maha viharaya, King Gothabhaya took action and decided to destroy the teachings of the cult and expelled 60 monks which was marked and banished out of Sri Lanka and they settled in India and a person with the name Sanghamitta had joined the cult.

Legacy

Gothabhaya had two sons named Jetthatissa and Mahasena. He entrusted the education of his sons to a South Indian monk named Sanghamitta who had befriended him. This turned out to be a key point in Sri Lankan history since Mahasena, who had embraced the Vaitulya doctrines taught by Sanghamitta, constructed the Jetavana temple which became one of the country's three main schools of Buddhism during the Anuradhapura period despite Gothabhaya's efforts to arrest the spread of Vaitulyavada.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Gothabhaya of Anuradhapura” as sri Lankan king of Anuradhapura from 254 to 267. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current 418-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Gothabhaya, Anuradhapura and Lankan can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as sri Lankan king of Anuradhapura from 254 to 267. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5587781. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gothabhaya of Anuradhapura”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gothabhaya of Anuradhapura primary sources, Gothabhaya of Anuradhapura archive and Gothabhaya research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gothabhaya of Anuradhapura”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Gothabhaya of Anuradhapura” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.