Gordon–Newell theorem
Extension of Jackson's theorem from open queueing networks to closed queueing networks of exponential servers where customers cannot leave the network

In queueing theory, a discipline within the mathematical theory of probability, the Gordon–Newell theorem is an extension of Jackson's theorem from open queueing networks to closed queueing networks of exponential servers where customers cannot leave the network. Jackson's theorem cannot be applied to closed networks because the queue length at a node in the closed network is limited by the population of the network. The Gordon–Newell theorem calculates the open network solution and then eliminates the infeasible states by renormalizing the probabilities. Calculation of the normalizing constant makes the treatment more awkward as the whole state space must be enumerated. Buzen's algorithm or mean value analysis can be used to calculate the normalizing constant more efficiently.
Definition of a Gordon–Newell network
A network of m interconnected queues is known as a Gordon–Newell network or closed Jackson network if it meets the following conditions:
the network is closed (no customers can enter or leave the network),
all service times are exponentially distributed and the service discipline at all queues is FCFS,
a customer completing service at queue i will move to queue j with probability
P
i
j
{\displaystyle P_{ij}}
, with the
P
i
j
{\displaystyle P_{ij}}
such that
∑
j
=
1
m
P
i
j
=
1
{\textstyle \sum _{j=1}^{m}P_{ij}=1}
,
the utilization of all of the queues is less than one.
Theorem
In a closed Gordon–Newell network of m queues, with a total population of K individuals, write
(
k
1
,
k
2
,
…
,
k
m
)
{\displaystyle \scriptstyle {(k_{1},k_{2},\ldots ,k_{m})}}
(where ki is the length of queue i) for the state of the network and S(K, m) for the state space
S
(
K
,
m
)
=
{
k
∈
N
m
such that
∑
i
=
1
m
k
i
=
K
}
.
{\displaystyle S(K,m)=\left\{\mathbf {k} \in \mathbb {N} ^{m}{\text{ such that }}\sum _{i=1}^{m}k_{i}=K\right\}.}
Then the equilibrium state probability distribution exists and is given by
π
(
k
1
,
k
2
,
…
,
k
m
)
=
1
G
(
K
)
∏
i
=
1
m
(
e
i
μ
i
)
k
i
{\displaystyle \pi (k_{1},k_{2},\ldots ,k_{m})={\frac {1}{G(K)}}\prod _{i=1}^{m}\left({\frac {e_{i}}{\mu _{i}}}\right)^{k_{i}}}
where service times at queue i are exponentially distributed with parameter μi. The normalizing constant G(K) is given by
G
(
K
)
=
∑
k
∈
S
(
K
,
m
)
∏
i
=
1
m
(
e
i
μ
i
)
k
i
,
{\displaystyle G(K)=\sum _{\mathbf {k} \in S(K,m)}\prod _{i=1}^{m}\left({\frac {e_{i}}{\mu _{i}}}\right)^{k_{i}},}
and ei is the visit ratio, calculated by solving the simultaneous equations
e
i
=
∑
j
=
1
m
e
j
p
j
i
for
1
≤
i
≤
m
.
The public source identifies “Gordon–Newell theorem” as extension of Jackson's theorem from open queueing networks to closed queueing networks of exponential servers where customers cannot leave the network. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Gordon, Newell and theorem.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Gordon–Newell theorem”, the useful work is to connect “extension of Jackson's theorem from open queueing networks to closed queueing networks of exponential servers where customers cannot leave the network” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5586067. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Gordon–Newell theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Gordon–Newell theorem primary sources, Gordon–Newell theorem archive and Gordon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gordon–Newell theorem”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Gordon–Newell theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.